Sauropod hypothesis: the base of the tail of sauropods was always more less horizontal. That is, the keystoning of the sacrum predicts the angle of the back from the ground. Prove me wrong @mike and @ScottHartman.

@john @mike I think tail angle was horizontal or less. I don't think any tetrapods with tail-based restractors habitually held the tail above horizontal for biomechanical reasons.

@john @mike I agree the tails were not arched into the air, even in the most keystoned of sacra, so it sets a minimum angle of the back. That's actually how I've been doing my new (or reposed) sauropod skeletals for 4 years or so now.

@john @mike And once people stop doing the GSP unguligrade pes posture the limbs tend to line up with such a pose (I switched all my sauropods to that 5-6 years ago, but I didn't say much outside of an SVP presentation about it).


@ScottHartman @mike I had noticed the shift in your skeletals, but i wasn’t sure whether you were deliberately not arching the tails, or whether it was a natural consequence of the other changes.

@john It was the confluence of several things - assuming tails don't go past vertical, getting a more realistic degree of flexion in the knee and ankle, and some small refinement to pectoral girdle placement. It's in my stack of like 3 dozen blog posts I have a planning folder for but never actually finished.

Sign in to participate in the conversation :: Vulcanodon

A Mastodon instance for sauropod appreciators everywhere. Our code of conduct is don't be a jerk.